Article Appraisal (Overview)
Sampling
- If sampling methods are not stated and cannot be inferred, you should error on the side of caution by assuming the most biased sampling method (i.e. convenience sampling) was used thereby reducing external validity.
Once you determine that a study has adequate construct, external and internal validity only then is it worth it to evaluate author’s conclusions and statistical results
Quality Assessment
Quality Assessment Tool for Studies with Diverse Designs (QATSDD)
- The QATSDD was originally developed for the field of psychology, but has been applied to other fields of health as well1.
- The QATSDD provides a framework for analyzing the congruency, transparency and organised reporting for research using “post-positivistic” or “positivist” methodology for multiple-methods or mixed-methods designs1.
- The QATSDD was not meant to be used as a filter to include or exclude studies from a review since the the QATSDD cutoffs are arbitrary1.
Quality Assessment for Diverse Studies (QuADS)
- Refined version of the QATSDD meant to better apply to health service research and not just psychology1.
- QuADS was meant for appraising quality of methods, evidence, and reporting for multi-method and/or mixed-method research1.
- QuADS tool demonstrates substantial interrater reliability and content and face validity according to Harrison1.
- Strengths (according to a synthesis by Harrison1)
Note
If I were to choose one, I would use QuADS over QATSDD
References
1.
Harrison R, Jones B, Gardner P, Lawton R. Quality assessment with diverse studies (QuADS): An appraisal tool for methodological and reporting quality in systematic reviews of mixed- or multi-method studies. BMC health services research. 2021;21(1):144. doi:10.1186/s12913-021-06122-y
Citation
For attribution, please cite this work as:
Yomogida N, Kerstein C. Article Appraisal
(Overview). https://yomokerst.com/The
Archive/Evidene Based Practice/Article
Appraisal/article_appraisal_overview.html